The FASTER Principles for Successful Carbon Pricing
Designing effective carbon pricing is not just about setting a price. It requires careful attention to fairness, policy alignment, predictability, and more. The World Bank and OECD developed the FASTER Principles as a guide for policymakers.
What Are the FASTER Principles?
FASTER is an acronym for six principles that should guide carbon pricing design:
- Fairness
- Alignment of policies and objectives
- Stability and predictability
- Transparency
- Efficiency and cost-effectiveness
- Reliability and environmental integrity
The FASTER Principles provide a checklist for evaluating whether a carbon pricing system is well-designed. A system that violates these principles is likely to face political, economic, or environmental problems.
Let us explore each principle in detail.
F: Fairness
Carbon pricing affects different people differently. A fair system considers these distributional impacts and addresses them.
Key considerations:
-
Impact on households: Carbon pricing can raise energy costs, affecting low-income households disproportionately since they spend a larger share of income on energy.
-
Impact on workers: Sectors facing high carbon costs may reduce employment. Workers in these sectors need support for transition.
-
Impact on regions: Areas dependent on fossil fuel industries face concentrated impacts.
-
International fairness: Developing countries with lower historical emissions may need different treatment than wealthy countries that industrialized first.
Example: Canada's federal carbon pricing returns revenue directly to households through the Climate Action Incentive. A family of four in Ontario receives about $1,500 per year. Since low-income households typically have lower emissions, they often receive more than they pay in higher energy costs, making the policy progressive overall.
How to achieve fairness:
- Use revenue to protect vulnerable households
- Support workers in transitioning sectors
- Design exemptions or rebates for exposed industries
- Consider equity in setting coverage and timelines
A: Alignment of Policies and Objectives
Carbon pricing should work with other policies, not against them. This means ensuring complementary policies are in place and countervailing policies are addressed.
Key considerations:
-
Remove fossil fuel subsidies before or alongside carbon pricing implementation.
-
Coordinate with energy policy to ensure electricity markets allow cost pass-through.
-
Align with climate targets so the carbon price level and trajectory support national emissions goals.
-
Integrate with fiscal policy to ensure carbon pricing fits within the broader tax system.
Think of policy alignment like a rowing team. If everyone rows in the same direction, the boat moves quickly. If some row forward while others row backward (like having carbon pricing and fossil fuel subsidies at the same time), progress is slow and energy is wasted.
S: Stability and Predictability
Businesses making long-term investments need to know what carbon will cost in the future. Unstable or unpredictable carbon prices undermine investment in low-carbon alternatives.
Key considerations:
-
Set clear price trajectories that give businesses visibility into future costs.
-
Avoid sudden policy changes that undermine investments made based on earlier signals.
-
Use price stability mechanisms in ETSs to prevent extreme volatility.
-
Build cross-party support so the policy survives changes in government.
Example: British Columbia's carbon tax has been in place since 2008, surviving multiple elections and changes in government. The long-term stability has allowed businesses to plan accordingly. The tax rate has increased over time, but always with advance notice.
How to achieve stability:
- Announce future price levels or cap trajectories well in advance
- Create independent institutions to manage the system
- Build broad political coalitions in support
- Include price floors and ceilings in ETSs
T: Transparency
A transparent carbon pricing system is easier to understand, harder to manipulate, and more likely to maintain public trust.
Key considerations:
-
Clear rules that everyone can understand and follow.
-
Public reporting of emissions, prices, and revenue use.
-
Open decision-making processes that stakeholders can participate in.
-
Accessible information for the public about how the system works.
Transparency builds trust. When people can see how carbon pricing works, where the money goes, and how decisions are made, they are more likely to support the policy.
How to achieve transparency:
- Publish emissions data from covered entities
- Report regularly on revenue collection and use
- Make allowance transaction data publicly available (for ETSs)
- Communicate clearly about how the system works
E: Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness
The whole point of carbon pricing is to reduce emissions at the lowest possible cost. An efficient system achieves this; an inefficient one wastes resources.
Key considerations:
-
Broad coverage ensures more emissions face the price signal, allowing reductions to occur wherever cheapest.
-
Avoid distorting exemptions that force reductions in expensive sectors while ignoring cheap opportunities.
-
Allow flexibility for when and how emissions are reduced.
-
Minimize administrative burden for both government and businesses.
Every time a sector is exempted from carbon pricing, potential low-cost emissions reductions are lost. Consider this example:
A country covers only its power sector with a $50/ton carbon price. Power generators invest heavily to reduce emissions. Meanwhile, the manufacturing sector (exempt) continues with business as usual.
The problem? Some reductions in manufacturing might cost only $30/ton, while the power sector is spending $50/ton. If manufacturing were covered, total costs would be lower for the same emissions reductions.
Of course, exemptions sometimes have legitimate purposes (like protecting trade-exposed industries or vulnerable households). But each exemption comes at a cost-effectiveness price.
R: Reliability and Environmental Integrity
Carbon pricing only works if it actually reduces emissions. Systems must be designed to ensure real environmental outcomes.
Key considerations:
-
Robust monitoring to accurately measure emissions.
-
Effective enforcement so non-compliance has consequences.
-
High-quality offsets if credits are allowed for compliance.
-
Caps that decline over time in ETSs.
How to achieve reliability:
- Invest in MRV (monitoring, reporting, verification) systems
- Set penalties high enough to deter cheating
- Limit or carefully screen offset use
- Regularly review and strengthen the system
Applying FASTER: A Checklist
When evaluating a carbon pricing proposal, ask:
| Principle | Key Questions |
|---|---|
| Fairness | Who bears the costs? Are vulnerable groups protected? |
| Alignment | Does this work with other policies? Are subsidies being reformed? |
| Stability | Will the price be predictable? Is there political durability? |
| Transparency | Can people understand and track the system? |
| Efficiency | Is coverage broad? Are exemptions minimized? |
| Reliability | Will this actually reduce emissions? Is enforcement strong? |
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Carbon pricing can fail if designers ignore FASTER principles:
Setting prices too low (fails Reliability and Efficiency)
Maintaining fossil fuel subsidies (fails Alignment)
Changing rules unpredictably (fails Stability)
Exempting most emissions (fails Efficiency and Reliability)
Ignoring impacts on low-income households (fails Fairness)
Operating in secrecy (fails Transparency)
Well-designed carbon pricing follows all six FASTER principles. Weakness on any one dimension can undermine the entire system's effectiveness and political sustainability.
Looking Ahead
Now that we understand the fundamentals of carbon pricing, the next module dives deep into carbon tax design. We will explore how to define the tax base, set the rate, and administer the tax effectively.